USPTO serial 76335456
SILCRYST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 2009
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILCRYST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SMITH & NEPHEW (OVERSEAS) LIMITED
LONDON, GB
Alberta T8L 3W4, CA
Alberta T8L 3W4, CA
Alberta T8L 3W4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | (Based on 44(e)) metal coatings and metal powders used to prevent the growth of microbes for use in the field of medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | (Based on Use in Commerce and 44(e)) medical and surgical wound and burn dressings utilizing antimicrobial coatings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMITH & NEPHEW (OVERSEAS) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Nucryst Pharmaceuticals Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucryst Pharmaceuticals Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucryst Pharmaceuticals Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SILCRYST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |