USPTO serial 76335457
NUCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B. BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical products, namely, preparations for the treatment of arthritis, cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, sexually transmitted diseases, dermatological conditions, disorders and diseases; respiratory conditions, disorders and diseases; ophthalmic conditions, disorders and diseases, dental, oral and periodontal conditions, disorders and diseases; preparations for wound care, treatment and healing; pediatric creams and ointments for skin conditions | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely orthopaedic joint implants and appliances for shoulders, hips, knees, and elbows, namely, external fixators and transcutaneous fixator devices; catheters utilizing antimicrobial coatings; catheter accessories utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely collection bags and tubings; wound closures utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely surgical staples, sutures, tapes, bandages; abdominal support meshes and surgical draperies utilizing antimicrobial coatings; surgical cutting instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely scalpels, scissors, curettes, trepans, trephines; surgical clamping and grasping instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely forceps, hemostats, clamps, and retractors; dental instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely mirrors and probes; cannulating instruments for laproscopic and arthroscopic procedures all utilizing antimicrobial coatings; biopsy instruments utilizing antimicrobial coatings, namely needles and punches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucryst Pharmaceuticals Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Nucryst Pharmaceuticals Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named NUCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |