Drawing for JERUSALEM STONE

USPTO serial 76335533

JERUSALEM STONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JERUSALEM STONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry H. Flax

SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP100 S CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Laminatefloor coveringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 23, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 6, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 20, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 20, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 9, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance