USPTO serial 76335548
BOSLEY HEALTHY HAIR COMPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2981323Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2005
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOSLEY HEALTHY HAIR COMPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
Daniel M. Cislo CISLO & THOMAS LLP1333 2nd Street, Suite 500Santa Monica, CA 90401-4110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care preparations, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair sprays, and hair gels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOSLEY MEDICAL INSTITUTE
- Other trademarks owned by BOSLEY MEDICAL INSTITUTE
- Other trademarks owned by BOSLEY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOSLEY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BOSLEY HEALTHY HAIR COMPLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |