Drawing for VISIONCREDIT

USPTO serial 76335559

VISIONCREDIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VISIONCREDIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie Bertagnolli

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sounds or images, magnetic data carriers, recording discs, videos, CD's, DVD'sACTIVE—
016printed matter, photographs, stationeryACTIVE—
035advertising, public relations, merchandising, franchisingACTIVE—
036financial affairs, in particular fund management and all kinds of financial investments in the film industryACTIVE—
038telecommunication, namely broadcastingACTIVE—
041entertainment, cultural activitiesACTIVE—
042licensing of intellectual property rightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Dec 22, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance