USPTO serial 76335624
DIGITAL PRECISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL PRECISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL R. CLOGAN
MICHAEL R CLOGAN STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP901 MAIN STR STE 4300DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER NETWORK DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE AND VIDEO DATA INTEGRATION; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF NETWORK AND SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, NAMELY, NETWORK DESIGN AND INSTALLATION, SECURITY AND NETWORK AUDITS, FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE UPGRADES, SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, DATA BASE DESIGN AND INTEGRATION, SYSTEM INTEGRATION, CONTRACT DEVELOPMENT AND OUTSOURCE SOLUTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTER NETWORKS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PROVIDING MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | May 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |