USPTO serial 76335630
SRGB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SRGB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
JILL ANDERFUREN MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital cameras; liquid crystal projectors, liquid crystal monitors, liquid crystal televisions, liquid crystal display panels, digital display apparatus, namely liquid crystal and light emitting diode displays; computers, computer printers; image scanners; computer software for color control of liquid crystal panels and computer printers; parts of all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |