Drawing for ASSIST

USPTO serial 76335634

ASSIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Optican Herman

STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT, STE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035distributorship services featuring replacement membranes and parts and cleaning and conditioning chemical for ultrafiltration, microfiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis membrane systems for use in industrial, manufacturing and commercial filtration applicationsACTIVE—
037maintenance and repair of ultrafiltration, microfiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis membrane systems, for use in industrial, manufacturing and commercial applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 19, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance