USPTO serial 76335835
TOP TUNES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOP TUNES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Courtney J. Miller
COURTNEY J MILLER CALFEE, HALTER, & GRISWOLD LLP1650 FIFTH THIRD CTR21 E STATE STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215-4243Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail stores and retail store services available through computer communications for audio components specifically for use in karaoke, namely, compact discs containing songs that have been re-recorded by musicians other than the original artists, and in which some or all of the vocal lines may have been removed, and in which graphics such as song lyrics or other images have been added; compact disc players, audio amplifiers, microphones, audio speakers, and cables | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |