Drawing for STERILOX

USPTO serial 76335932

STERILOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STERILOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana R. Kaplan, Esq.

DANA R KAPLAN ESQ KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the manufacture of fluid chemical biocide, namely, mechanical mixing tanks, pumps, extractors, strainers, agitators, kneaders and emulsifiers, that are used in connection with a fluid chemical biocide to cleanse, disinfect, sterilize or wash medical instruments, devices and equipment, hospital dressings, medical packaging and drug delivery devices and systems, clothing, gloves and surgical masks, industrial and petrochemical pipes and equipment and structures, equipment and persons and animals exposed to germicidal attack, accident or epidemic warranting military or government responseACTIVE—
011Residential, municipal and agricultural potable and non-potable water supply systems and water treatment systems comprised of chemical sterilization units, for the treatment of drinking water, pool water, process water, and waste water; waste water treatment equipment, namely chemical sterilization units; air conditioners and cooling tower filtration systems and pool filtration systems comprised of chemical sterilization units; and air emission control equipment, namely, air scrubbing and odor control equipment in the nature of treating air with electrochemically activated waterACTIVE—
017Replacement plumbing pipes of plastic and rubber for industrial hoses of plastic and rubber for use in sterilization machines and treatment systems in the medical sterilization, water supply, and water treatment industries, for exclusive use in Applicant's proprietary machines and systemsACTIVE—
037Installation of biocide sterilizing systems with medical, dental, pharmaceutical, industrial, manufacturing, water treatment, residential, military and public safety applicationsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of biocide sterilizing systems with medical, dental, pharmaceutical, industrial, manufacturing, water treatment, residential, military and public safety applications for othersACTIVE—
042Development of new technology for others in the field of biocide sterilizing systems with medical, dental, pharmaceutical, industrial, manufacturing, water treatment, residential, military and public safety applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 25, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 25, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 25, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 3, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 17, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 8, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 25, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance