USPTO serial 76335985
STEMCYTE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEMCYTE RESEARCH INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Malutta
ANTHONY J MALUTTA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Biomedical services, namely the collection, processing, analysis, screening, testing, typing and storage of human tissue, blood, blood components and stem cells; reference and clinical laboratory services for others, namely the testing, screening and analysis of biological substances, human leukocyte antigen DNA and serological typing and blood typing; biomedical, pathology and laboratory medicine consultation services for others; providing advice on scientific and medical matters, providing advice on pre-clinical and clinical trials and the FDA approval process, and professional interpretation and diagnosis in pathology and laboratory medicine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |