USPTO serial 76336046
Q10 ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3036139Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Q10 ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Potomac, MD
Potomac, MD
POTOMAC, MD
POTOMAC, MD
Bethesda, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional food supplements and vitamins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Doctors' Preferred, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Doctors' Preferred, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PH DPI, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PH DPI, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Healthy Directions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named Q10 ADVANTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |