Drawing for EMERGE

USPTO serial 76336066

EMERGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2988447Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 30, 2005
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMERGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D. ST. LANDAU

C/O DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, SPORTS DRINKS, ISOTONIC ENERGY DRINKS, FLAVORED WATERS, SOFT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; POWDERS AND SYRUPS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; MINERAL WATERS; AERATED WATERSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 2, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2008C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2007C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 1, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 26, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 29, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance