USPTO serial 76336640
WE GOT UPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WE GOT UPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Mulholland
MARK S MULHOLLAND RUSKIN, MOSCOU, EVANS & FALTISCHEK190 EAB PLZ E TWR 15TH FLUNIONDALE, NY 11556-0190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely socks, sweat socks, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, swim wear, warm-up suits, underpants, undershirts, thermal underwear, shirts, bathing suits, pants, snow pants, wind resistant jackets, infant wear, coats, hats, scarves and gloves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |