USPTO serial 76336644
NEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
ICC IMAGINE COMMUNICATIONS CANADA LTD.
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ICC IMAGINE COMMUNICATIONS CANADA LTD.
North York, Ontario, CA
North York, Ontario, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
LEITCH TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
TORONTO, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEITCH TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
TORONTO, CA
0960471 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by 0960471 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Showalter
Donald S. Showalter GRAYROBINSON, P.A.P.O. Box 2328FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISION, VIDEO AND AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSING, SWITCHING AND GENERATING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FRAME SYNCHRONIZERS, AUDIO SYNCHRONIZERS, AUDIO DELAYS, AUDIO EMBEDDERS/DEEMBEDDERS, AUDIO PROCESSORS, LOGO GENERATORS AND INSERTERS, SYNCGENERATORS AND INSERTERS, TIME CODE GENERATORS AND INSERTERS, VIDEO AND AUDIO DISTRIBUTION AND PROCESSING AMPLIFIERS, ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERTERS, DIGITAL TO ANALOG CONVERTERS, COLOR ENCODERS AND DECODERS, CLOCK SYSTEM DRIVERS, CLOCK DISPLAYS, AUTOMATION SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING, MONITORING, ADJUSTING, OPTIMIZING OR OPERATING THE AFORESAID GOODS, AND BROADCAST FACILITIES; VIDEO AND AUDIO NOISE REDUCERS, VIDEO AND AUDIO COMPRESSION SYSTEMS, NAMELY COMPUTER SOFTWARE, HARDWARE AND MULTI-RATE CODER-DECODERS, CODECS, FOR DECREASING AUDIO, VIDEO, TELEVISION, OR DATA FILE SIZE OR TRANSMISSION BANDWIDTH AND DECODING OR DECOMPRESSING COMPRESSED CONTENT TO SUBSTANTIALLY RESTORE THE ORIGINAL AUDIO, VIDEO, TELEVISION OR DATA CONTENT; TEST AND REFERENCE GENERATORS, FORMAT CONVERTERS, CONVERTERS OF STANDARD TELEVISION AND VIDEO SIGNALS TO AND FROM HIGH DEFINITION FORMATS, ASPECT RATIO CONVERTERS, CLOSED CAPTION AND OTHER ANCILLARY DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT FOR THE INSERTION, DELETION AND/OR MODIFICATION OF ANCILLARY DATA ASSOCIATED WITH VIDEO, AUDIO, OR TELEVISION CONTENT; MULTIPLEXERS, EMBEDDERS, DEEMBEDDERS AND DEMULTIPLEXERS, ROUTERS, SWITCHERS AND SWITCHING ROUTERS, EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURES, REMOTE CONTROL PANELS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING AND MONITORING THE AFORESAID GOODS, ALL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEITCH TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ICC IMAGINE COMMUNICATIONS CANADA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LEITCH TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LEITCH TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by HB CANADA COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LEITCH TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIS CANADA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 0960471 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NEO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |