USPTO serial 76336659
QUANTUM LEAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUANTUM LEAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUCY ARANT
LUCY ARANT MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLPTRIDENT CTR11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR AND CLOTHING, NAMELY, DRESSES, HATS, JACKETS, PANTS, SHIRTS, AND UNDERWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |