USPTO serial 76336688
NANOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROHIT U. SHENDRIKAR
ROHIT U SHENDRIKAR MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2003 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |