Drawing for JINX

USPTO serial 76336697

JINX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JINX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTER AND VIDEO GAME COMPONENTS, APPARATUS, AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES, -TAPES, AND SOFTWARE AND PARTS THEREFOR; COMPUTER GAME JOYSTICKS; VIDEO GAME CONTROLLERSACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS, BOOKS AND MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF INTERACTIVE COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENTACTIVE—
028TOYS, GAMES, AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance