USPTO serial 76336757
DILIGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DILIGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elise Tenen-Aoki
ELISE TENEN-AOKI GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP2450 COLORADO AVE STE 400 ESANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software enabling procurement departments to analyze, manage and create standards around their sourcing processes; computer software for the analysis of existing commodity spend data from internal systems so organizations can understand opportunities for cost reductions and supplier/partner improvements; computer software for the analysis, creation, publishing, and evaluation of request for proposal/quote/information (RFP/RFQ/FRI), which are responded to by their suppliers; computer software for publishing, conducting, and evaluation of on-line auctions; computer software for creating, negotiating and binding of contracts; computer software for the automation of post-bind contract compliance which takes data from enterprise resources planning (ERP) systems and actively compares it to existing contracts for internal auditing; computer software for collecting supplier data from compliance, internal surveying, and data to "scorecard" supplier performance, as well as to measure against internal key performance indicators (KPIs) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |