USPTO serial 76336779
MICROTORQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MICROTORQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*
Plus Government fees of $2,600
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COREY A. DONALDSON
COREY A. DONALDSON FERGUSON CASE ORR PATERSON LLP1050 SOUTH KIMBALL ROADVENTURA, CA 93004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Manually operated metal directional control valves | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2003 |
| 007 | Machine parts, namely, control valves for machines | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2003 |
| 009 | Solenoid, manually operated and automatic directional control valves for electrical and scientific apparatus, namely, aircraft ground support equipment, namely, hydraulic test stands, test stands and aircraft towing equipment; hydraulic automatic door openers; solid waste disposal equipment; solid waste disposal trucks; automotive service equipment, namely, flushing equipment and steam cleaners; balers; compactors; concrete pipe machinery; construction equipment, namely, railroad maintenance equipment, rock crushers, earth compactors, wire tensioning equipment for electrical transmission lines, crawler type rock drills, excavators, power shovels, logging equipment, Redi-Mix trucks, hydraulic jacks, winches, concrete carts, earth movers, mobile work platforms, dredging machinery, tunnel boring machinery, batch plants, and dry mix cement trucks; control systems, namely, controls manufacturing, control panels, control systems in power plants, control machines, and process compressors; aircraft hanger doors; fluid power systems, namely, hydraulic systems, fluid power systems for aircraft carriers, and power packs; fluid power equipment, namely, accumulators, power packs, and broad line manufacturing; foundry equipment; hoists; cranes, industrial trucks, tractors, trailers and stackers; aircraft towing equipment; towing equipment; industrial jacks; machine tools; hydraulic and pneumatic presses; marine and shipboard equipment, namely, hydraulic systems, hydraulic winches and steering systems; materials handling equipment, namely, conveyers, pneumatic conveyers, airline ground service equipment, lift trucks, ski lifts, truck unloaders, and lift gates for trucks; oil and gas equipment, namely, pipe joining equipment, blow Out prevention closing units, wire line equipment, truck mounted drilling rigs, mud systems, portable refinery, seismic exploration equipment, well head control, well logging equipment, oil heaters, pipe testing equipment, off-shore drilling equipment, drill string compensators, truck-mounted oil well service rigs, and heat recovery equipment; paper manufacturing equipment and paper converting equipment, namely, corrugators, web guide equipment, roll doctors, and paper plate machines; plastics manufacturing machinery, namely, injection molding machines, screen changers, mold leak correctors, mold systems, extruders, polyurethane equipment, presses, blow molding machinery, and floor tile manufacturing machinery; rubber manufacturing machinery, namely, tire recapping equipment, rubber presses, tire manufacturing equipment; steel and aluminum mill equipment, namely, aluminum mill equipment, steel mill equipment and BOF cleaning equipment; testing equipment, namely, test stands, hydraulic test stands, and general test equipment | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2003 |
| 011 | Directional control valves for electrical and scientific apparatus, namely, aircraft ground support equipment, namely, hydraulic test stands, test stands and aircraft towing equipment; hydraulic automatic door openers; solid waste disposal equipment; solid waste disposal trucks; automotive service equipment, namely, flushing equipment and steam cleaners; balers; compactors; concrete pipe machinery; construction equipment, namely, railroad maintenance equipment, rock crushers, earth compactors, wire tensioning equipment for electrical transmission lines, crawler type rock drills, excavators, power shovels, logging equipment, Redi-Mix trucks, hydraulic jacks, winches, concrete carts, earth movers, mobile work platforms, dredging machinery, tunnel boring machinery, batch plants, and dry mix cement trucks; control systems, namely, controls manufacturing, control panels, control systems in power plants, control machines, and process compressors; aircraft hanger doors; fluid power systems, namely, hydraulic systems, fluid power systems for aircraft carriers, and power packs; fluid power equipment, namely, accumulators, power packs, and broad line manufacturing; foundry equipment; hoists; cranes, industrial trucks, tractors, trailers and stackers; aircraft towing equipment; towing equipment; industrial jacks; machine tools; hydraulic and pneumatic presses; marine and shipboard equipment, namely, hydraulic systems, hydraulic winches and steering systems; materials handling equipment, namely, conveyers, pneumatic conveyers, airline ground service equipment, lift trucks, ski lifts, truck unloaders, and lift gates for trucks; oil and gas equipment, namely, pipe joining equipment, blow out prevention closing units, wire line equipment, truck mounted drilling rigs, mud systems, portable refinery, seismic exploration equipment, well head control, well logging equipment, oil heaters, pipe testing equipment, off-shore drilling equipment, drill string compensators, truck-mounted oil well service rigs, and heat recovery equipment; paper manufacturing equipment and paper converting equipment, namely, corrugators, web guide equipment, roll doctors, and paper plate machines; plastics manufacturing machinery, namely, injection molding machines, screen changers, mold leak correctors, mold systems, extruders, polyurethane equipment, presses, blow molding machinery, and floor tile manufacturing machinery; rubber manufacturing machinery, namely, tire recapping equipment, rubber presses, tire manufacturing equipment; steel and aluminum mill equipment, namely, aluminum mill equipment, steel mill equipment and BOF cleaning equipment; testing equipment, namely, test stands, hydraulic test stands, and general test equipment | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Barksdale, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Barksdale, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Barksdale, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MICROTORQUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 3, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 6, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |