USPTO serial 76336858
ULTRA OXI BRITE OXYGEN ACTIVATED STAIN REMOVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA OXI BRITE OXYGEN ACTIVATED STAIN REMOVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony de Fazekas
ANTHONY DE FAZEKAS MILLER THOMSON LLP20 QUEEN ST W STE 2500TORONTO, ON M5H 3S1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | household cleaning preparations, namely, stain removers and odour removers for clothing and textile | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |