Drawing for K-RATIONS

USPTO serial 76336908

K-RATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K-RATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie K. Mitchell, Esq.

LESLIE K MITCHELL ESQ FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements in the form of an energy barACTIVE—
029Packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables which contains bakery goods; potato chips; fruit based energy foods bars; candied fruit; candied fruit snacks; candied nuts; candied fruit snacks; processed nuts; yogurtACTIVE—
030Foods and ingredients of foods, namely, snack cakes; cupcakes; candy; candy tarts; tart bakery goods; tortilla chips; cereal; mixes for bakery goods; ice bars; cereal-based energy snack food bars; ready to eat cereal derived energy food bars; grain-based energy food bars; candy bars containing nutritional additives for energy; packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice which contains bakery goods; dessert souffles and bakery desserts which are placed in packaged meals; bakery goods; mixes for making bakery goods; edible cake decorations; cake mixes; cakes; pies; candy; candy cake decorations; candy coated popcorn; caramel popcorn; caramels; cereal based snack food; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate powder; chocolate syrup; chocolate topping; chocolate truffles; chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; cocoa; cocoa mixes; cones for ice cream; confectionery chips for baking; frozen confections; cookies; crackers; custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; frozen custards; Danish pastries; dessert souffles; doughnuts; dumplings; eclairs; flavoring syrup; food flavorings using non-essential oils; chocolate fondue; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; frosting mixes; frostings; frozen yogurt; fruit ice; fruit pies; flavored and sweetened gelatins; gingerbread; glazed popcorn; granola; granola-based snack bars; hot chocolate; ice cream; ice cream substitute; soy-based ice cream substitute; ice milk; flavored ices; icing; icing mixes; marshmallow topping; milkshakes; bases for making milkshakes; candy mints; molasses; muffins; nuts; parfaits; pastries; peanut butter confectionery chips; pies; popped popcorn; processed unpopped popcorn; pretzels; puddings; puffed corn snacks; sauces; seasonings; sherbet; granola-based snack bars; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; sorbet; syrup flavoring; syrup topping; tapioca; thickening agents for use in cooking; topping syrup; wafersACTIVE—
031Raw or fresh nutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance