USPTO serial 76337336
POPWICHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POPWICHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell
Leslie K. Mitchell Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements in the form of an energy bar | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables which contains bakery goods; potato chips; fruit based energy foods bars; candied fruit; candied fruit snacks; candied nuts; processed nuts; yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Foods and ingredients of foods, namely, snack cakes; cupcakes; candy; candy tarts; tart bakery goods; tortilla chips; cereal; mixes for bakery goods; cereal-based energy snack food bars; ready to eat cereal derived energy food bars; grain-based energy food bars; candy bars containing nutritional additives for energy; packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice which contains bakery goods; dessert souffles and bakery desserts which are placed in packaged meals; bakery goods; mixes for making bakery goods; edible cake decorations; cake mixes; cakes; pies; candy; candy cake decorations; candy coated popcorn; caramel popcorn; caramels; cereal based snack food; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate powder; chocolate syrup; chocolate topping, chocolate truffles; chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; cocoa; cocoa mixes; cones for ice cream; confectionery chips for baking; frozen confections; cookies; crackers; custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; frozen custards; Danish pastries; dessert souffles; doughnuts; dumplings; eclairs; flavoring syrup; food flavorings using non-essential oils; chocolate fondue; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring; ingredient or filler; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; frosting mixes; frostings; frozen yogurt; fruit ice; fruit pies; flavored and sweetened gelatins; gingerbread; glazed popcorn; granola; granola-based snack bars; hot chocolate; ice cream; ice cream substitute; soy-based ice cream substitute; ice milk; flavored ices; icing; icing mixes; marshmallow topping; milkshakes; bases for making milkshakes; candy mints; molasses; muffins; nuts; parfaits; pastries; peanut butter confectionery chips; pies; popped popcorn; processed unpopped popcorn; pretzels; puddings; puffed corn snacks; sauces; seasonings; sherbet; granola-based snack bars; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; sorbet; syrup flavoring; syrup topping; tapioca; thickening agents for use in cooking; topping syrup; wafers | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Raw or fresh nuts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named POPWICHES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |