Drawing for COMPREMEX

USPTO serial 76337372

COMPREMEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPREMEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Tang

John A. Tang STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP909 FANNIN STREETSUITE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services and retail store services featuring kitchen appliances, computer hardware and software, televisions, video cassette recorders, compact disc players, digital video recorders, cellular telephones, cameras, personal stereos, stereo amplifiers, receivers and tuners; income tax services, namely, tax preparation, consultation and assessmentsACTIVE—
036Money order services and traveler's checks issuance services; wire transfer services; prepaid telephone calling card services, local and long distance telephone calling card services, and cellular calling card services; issuing stored value card services; check cashing services; payday loans; bill paying services; foreign currency exchange services; auto insurance servicesACTIVE—
039Travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for transportation; postal services, namely express mail delivery services; courier servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance