USPTO serial 76337375
BRAND DASHBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAND DASHBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Williamsville, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that tracks uses of brand names and products; and computer hardware and software that extracts, retrieves, searches, compiles, indexes, organizes and analyzes information and data mining on products and brand name occurrences in the print and broadcast media | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Market analysis, namely, the analysis of brand name occurrences in the print and broadcast media; licensing of software that extracts, retrieves, searches, compiles, indexes, organizes and analyzes information and data mining on products and brand name occurrences in the print and broadcast media; an automated computer services, namely, tracking and analysis of the usage of brand names in the print and broadcast media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, the troubleshooting of software that tracks uses of brand names and products and of computer hardware and software that extracts, retrieves, searches, compiles, indexes, organizes and analyzes information and data mining on products and brand name occurrences in the print and broadcast media; technical support services, namely, the maintenance and installation of software that tracks uses of brand names an products and software that extracts, retrieves, searches, compiles, indexes, organizes and analyzes information and data mining on products and brand name occurrences in the print and broadcast media; and computer consulting services, namely, consultation regarding that extracts, retrieves, searches, compiles, indexes, organizes and analyzes information and data mining on product and brand name occurrences in the print and broadcast media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |