USPTO serial 76337471
WM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo 141-0021, JP
Tokyo 141-0021, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
Evan M. Kent MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP, LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Travel agency services; namely, making reservations and booking; providing information on accommodations; booking of rooms for party and restaurant; restaurant services, namely providing food and beverages; providing information in the field of food preparation; providing meteorological information, providing fashion information; providing political information; introducing of marriage or friendship partners; computer software design and programming for others and maintenance of computer software by means of communication by computer terminals; computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software for computer communication network system; providing information on designs of computer programs and computer communication network systems; consultancy in computer software designs, computer programming, computer operating, computer conditioning and installments of computer programs, and upgrading and adding the functions of computer programs, and computer programs maintenance; consultation in the field of network system design and computer network systems operations; design of web pages for others; providing search engines and global computer network; providing information on security guarding for facilities and personal body guarding; providing information on massage, moxibuston, therapeutic shiatsu massage and treatment to joint-dislocation, sprains, bone fracture or the like; leasing access time to a computer database; providing intellectual property information; providing bath house information; providing scheduled space on computer networks for individuals or business enterprises; providing beauty arts information; providing religious courtesy information; providing governmental economic policy information; providing computer programming information; providing personal identity information; providing fortune telling information; providing medical service of doctors, clinics, hospitals, pharmacies or the like; providing medical surprise information; providing information on rental of conference rooms; providing information on rental of facilities for exhibitions and data warehousing; computer website design for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |