Drawing for CALTARIAN

USPTO serial 76337480

CALTARIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALTARIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bingham B. Leverich

BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COLLECTING, NORMALIZING, CORRELATING, PRIORITIZING AND PROCESSING NETWORK ACTIVITY DATA TO DETECT SUSPICIOUS, MALICIOUS OR ABUSIVE ACTIVITY AND TO PROTECT AGAINST SUCH ACTIVITYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 12, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance