USPTO serial 76337504
THE SENSIBLE WAY TO OWN THE VERY BEST.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3283325Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2007
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SENSIBLE WAY TO OWN THE VERY BEST.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Destination Club Partners, L.L.C
Park City, UT
Destination Club Partners, L.L.C
Park City, UT
Destination Club Partners, L.L.C
Park City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant R. Clayton
GRANT R CLAYTON CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON, PCPO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services for others in the field of resort recreation clubs; vacation clubs, undivided deed interest clubs, private residence clubs, right to use clubs, and long term lease | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Real estate services, namely, providing memberships in undivided deed interest clubs, undivided deed interest clubs, private residence clubs, right to use clubs, and long term lease projects at resort and vacation locations; Real estate brokerage services, namely, facilitating the sale, exchange and trade of resort and vacation time for members of resort recreation clubs, undivided deed interest clubs, private residence clubs, right to use clubs, and long term lease projects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Real estate development services, namely, development of real estate projects, undivided deed interest clubs, private residence clubs, right to use clubs, and long term lease projects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Destination Club Partners, L.L.C
- Other trademarks owned by Destination Club Partners, L.L.C
- Other trademarks owned by Destination Club Partners, L.L.C
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE SENSIBLE WAY TO OWN THE VERY BEST.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |