USPTO serial 76337539
CREATING PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2003
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CREATING PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
80333 Munchen, DE
80333 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT R COX
SCOTT R COX Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Mahan, P.S.C.500 W. Jefferson St.Suite 2100Louisville, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for use in industry, in particular, clays and clay minerals, earths for bleaching, adsorbents and drying agents, preparations for use as auxiliaries in foundries, swelling agents and thickening agents, all based on clays, suspensions for use as drilling fluids or drilling muds, fillers carriers substances, mineral acids, catalysts and carrier substances for catalysts, preparations for purification of water and waste water; chemical products for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; animal feed additives; chemical products for use in science | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 26, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |