Drawing for PROFESSOR BASEBALL

USPTO serial 76337678

PROFESSOR BASEBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROFESSOR BASEBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Suzanne J. Weslow

SUZANNE J WESLOW CHAPMAN HALL 380UWM OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS2310 E HARTFORD AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53211

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting online exhibitions via university website and displays and interactive exhibits rendered through entertainment presentation or factual information presentation on baseball stadium scoreboard between innings of major league baseball games and other exhibitions such as a display in baseball stadium in the field of baseballABANDONEDMar 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance