USPTO serial 76337806
BAUER AUDIO VISUAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAUER AUDIO VISUAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer K. Schreck
JENNIFER K SCHRECK GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80202-2641UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | RENTAL OF AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; STAGING SERVICES, NAMELY AUDIO, VIDEO, AND LIGHTING PRODUCTION AND PROJECTION SERVICES FOR LIVE EVENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |