Drawing for MEGAFLEX

USPTO serial 76337841

MEGAFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGAFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

DUANE M BYERS NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD STE 800ARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations and veterinary preparations for the treatment of aches, pains, ailments and injuries related to muscles, tendons, ligaments and living tissue; medical adhesive tapes; gauzes; medical plasters; bandages for wounds or damages to muscles, tendons, ligaments and living tissue; wound dressing; excluding veterinary nutritional supplements for mammals such as horsesACTIVE—
010magnets for medical purposes; magnetic patches, tapes, gauzes, plasters, bandages, dressings and garments all for therapeutic use; magnetic patches, tapes, gauzes, plasters, bandages, dressings and garments all for use in magnetic medical treatment; orthopedic support bandages; garments for therapeutic use, namely, body corsets, body limb wraps, head and neck wraps, and clothing items employing magnetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance