USPTO serial 76337842
BIOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BIOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RHEINMAGNET Horst Baermann GmbH
53819 Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, DE
RHEINMAGNET Horst Baermann GmbH
53819 Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, DE
RHEINMAGNET Horst Baermann GmbH
Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathon T. Reavill
Jonathon T. Reavill NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.11th Floor901 NORTH GLEBE ROADARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | [ Magnets for medical purposes; magnetic patches, bandages, and garments all for therapeutic use; magnetic patches, bandages, and garments all for use in magnetic medical treatment; orthopedic support bandages; compression and elastic bandages, but not for wound care; garments for therapeutic use, namely, body corsets, body limb wraps, head and neck wraps, and clothing items employing magnets ] * Magnets for medical purposes, namely, magnets for wellness purposes or magnets for therapeutic purposes * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RHEINMAGNET Horst Baermann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by RHEINMAGNET Horst Baermann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by RHEINMAGNET Horst Baermann GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BIOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 13, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |