Drawing for BONEFISH CREEK

USPTO serial 76338009

BONEFISH CREEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONEFISH CREEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID M. PERRY

DAVID M PERRY BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLPONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVEAug 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 15, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 9, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Sep 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 10, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 3, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 30, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance