USPTO serial 76338024
AMAZON SB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMAZON SB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Almeirim, Para, BR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | MINERAL ORES SOLD IN UNFINISHED FORM FOR FURTHER MANUFACTURE, NAMELY, KAOLIN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |