Drawing for MAIZ SOLO CORN OIL

USPTO serial 76338222

MAIZ SOLO CORN OIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAIZ SOLO CORN OIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Cyril Malloy

JOHN CYRIL MALLOY HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY2800 S W THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029corn oilACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance