Drawing for LTE CLASSICS JMW

USPTO serial 76338348

LTE CLASSICS JMW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LTE CLASSICS JMW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Publication of booksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 29, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance