Drawing for BONE FISH CREEK

USPTO serial 76338389

BONE FISH CREEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONE FISH CREEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William R. Trueba, Jr.

William R. Trueba, Jr. Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan & Berlin, PL201 S. Biscayne Blvd., 17th FloorMiami, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVEAug 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 19, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 16, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 17, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 27, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 19, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 22, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 18, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 11, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 4, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 30, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance