Drawing for GENERATION KIKAIDA

USPTO serial 76338455

GENERATION KIKAIDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GENERATION KIKAIDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen E. Goldstein

STEPHEN E GOLDSTEIN DWYER SCHRAFFMEYER JOSSEM ET AL900 FORT ST MALL STE 1800HONOLULU, HI 96813-3715UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical goods, namely, prerecorded DVDs featuring television entertainment programming, prerecorded video tapes featuring television entertainment programming, mouse pads, phone cards with magnetic strips and credit cards with magnetic stripsACTIVEOct 27, 2003
016Paper goods, namely, comic books, comic strips, looseleaf paper, notebooks, stickers, napkins, paper placemats, trading cards, temporary adhesive tattoos, book covers, letterhead, decals, calendars, stationery, coloring books, paper shopping bags, pens, pencils, markers, erasers, binders, children's books, notepads, self-adhesive notepads, staplers, paper party favors, paper party hats, phonecards without magnetic strips and credit cards without magnetic strips and lunchbagsACTIVEOct 27, 2003
021Housewares, namely, mugs, cups, plates, placemats, bowls, sports bottles sold empty, non-metallic canteens, lunchboxes, lunchbags, brushes, combs, toothbrushes, household containers not of precious metal; paper cups; paper platesACTIVEOct 27, 2003
025Clothing, namely, men's, women's and children's coats, sweatshirts, sweatpants, T-shirts, pants, shoes, hats, gloves, mittens, undergarments, dresses, skirts, pullovers, sweaters, vests, jeans, swimsuits, swim trunks, shorts, overalls, pajamas, socks, bathrobes, belts, rashguards, dress shirts, polo shirts, and visorsACTIVEOct 27, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 21, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 13, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 13, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 20, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance