Drawing for SEAL

USPTO serial 76338469

SEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MORRIS A. THURSTON

MORRIS A THURSTON LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CT DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1925UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, mascara, eye liners, eye brow pencils, eye shadow, artificial eyelashes, face powder, dusting powder, powder compacts containing make-up, rouge, liquid rouge, foundation, concealer, lipstick, lip liner, lip gloss and makeup remover; nail polish, nail polish remover, cuticle softener and cuticle cream; colognes, perfumes and toilet waters; toothpaste, mouthwash and tooth gel; sun screen, sun block and sun tanning preparations; antiperspirants, deodorants; aftershave lotions, shaving lotions and cream, shaving foam, after-shave balm, astringents, skin toner and skin tonic, body, hand and face lotions and creams; skin cleansers, soaps, bubble bath, toilet soap, bath and shower gels, bath oils, bath salts, bath crystals, body powders and talc, body spray and essential oils for personal useACTIVE—
018Handbags, purses, backpacks, briefcases, cosmetic bags and toiletry cases sold empty, vanity cases sold empty, wallets and change pursesACTIVE—
021Cosmetic accessories, namely, cosmetic brushes, facial sponges for applying make-up and applicators for applying make-up; hair brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2004EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Dec 19, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 18, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 11, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 11, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 7, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance