USPTO serial 76338494
50PLUS EXPEDITIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2885334Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2004
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 50PLUS EXPEDITIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
PENETANGUISHENE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 FOREST HILL DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, L5M 5A7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation, arranging travel tours and conducting sightseeing tours for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2001 |
| 042 | Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for meals and temporary lodging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |