Drawing for POLARIS FINANCIAL AIRPORT

USPTO serial 76338505

POLARIS FINANCIAL AIRPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POLARIS FINANCIAL AIRPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morton J. Rosenberg, Esq.

MORTON J ROSENBERG ESQ ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION PROVIDED TO INDIVIDUALS AND TRADITIONAL COMPANIES WITH NON- COMPUTERIZED REPORTSABANDONEDAug 28, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 19, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 19, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 11, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 4, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 19, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance