USPTO serial 76338522
SUPER HOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER HOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN4143 N 27TH STARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GAMES OF CHANCE, NAMELY, RAFFLE PULL TAB TICKETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |