USPTO serial 76338530
VERTICALLY INTEGRATED PROCESS MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERTICALLY INTEGRATED PROCESS MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George B. Snyder
GEORGE B SNYDER KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Tobacco, namely, smokeless tobacco and tobacco leaves for use in smokeless tobacco and manufactured tobacco or tobacco-derivative-containing products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named VERTICALLY INTEGRATED PROCESS MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |