Drawing for BUNKER BUSTER

USPTO serial 76338612

BUNKER BUSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUNKER BUSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher A. Mitchell

CHRISTOPHER A MITCHELL YOUNG & BASILE PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ice cream and ice cream novelty bars, frozen confections, and candyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 11, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance