USPTO serial 76338837
INTELLIGRATED MATERIAL HANDLING SOLUTIONS & SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGRATED MATERIAL HANDLING SOLUTIONS & SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTELLIGRATED HEADQUARTERS, LLC
MASON, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin R. Acheson
Edwin R. Acheson Frost Brown Todd LLC2200 PNC Center, 201 East Fifth StreetCincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | materials handling equipment, namely, belt conveyors, accumulation conveyors, power conveyors, gravity roller conveyors, slider bed conveyors, roller bed conveyors, gravity wheel conveyors, sortation conveyors, live roller conveyors, conveyor belts, conveyor motors, conveyor gears, drive pads, conveyor beds, pick belt frame rails, rollers, conveyor drive and take-up units, crown pulleys, gravity wheels, v-belt live rollers, belt driven live rollers, overhead cable-driven conveyors, case stops, deflectors, side guides, merge beds, carousels, floor supports and sortation equipment, namely, merge and induction carton conveyors, carton sortation conveyors, and aftersort or receiving conveyors, discharge conveyors, pop up wheels and pop up wheel rollers, slat/shoe sortation conveyors, line shaft conveyors, drive-out belt conveyors, conveyors for merging, diverging, and allowing cartons to cross from one side of a conveyor to another | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 26, 2001 |
| 037 | Installation of conveyor systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 26, 2001 |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of conveyors, engineering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 26, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGRATED HEADQUARTERS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligrated Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligrated Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligrated Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTELLIGRATED MATERIAL HANDLING SOLUTIONS & SERVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |