USPTO serial 76338868
EFLEXDESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EFLEXDESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Flextronics International Ltd.
#07 Meiban Industrial Building, SG
Flextronics International Ltd.
#07 Meiban Industrial Building, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H. Peck, John W. Crittenden, Janet L. Cullum, Andrew Hartman, Kent M. Walker, Peter J. Willsey, Britt L. Anderson, Adam L. Barea, Keith J. Berets, Susan D. Berney-Key, Todd S. Bontemps, Francine M. Hanson, Lisa K. Koenig and Gretchen R. Stroud
ANNE H PECK ESQ COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ 4TH FL3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | design services for others in the fields of integrated circuits, printed circuit boards, product enclosures, and other electronic, mechanical and plastic products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |