USPTO serial 76339055
SIZE-A-WEEK SLIM DOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3068555Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIZE-A-WEEK SLIM DOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
Daniel M. Cislo CISLO & THOMAS LLP12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90025-7103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line information services relating to weight loss, diet, fitness, and health | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C SQUARED TV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by C SQUARED TV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by C SQUARED TV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Provida Life Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIZE-A-WEEK SLIM DOWN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |