USPTO serial 76339123
POWER UP! BUILDING READING STRENGTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWER UP! BUILDING READING STRENGTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY HORBACZEWSKI
HENRY HORBACZEWSKI REED ELSEVIER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYMANAGEMENT SERVICES INC1105 N MARKET ST STE 900WILMINGTON, DE 19801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and prerecorded audio tapes for teaching reading | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |