Drawing for POWER UP! BUILDING READING STRENGTH

USPTO serial 76339123

POWER UP! BUILDING READING STRENGTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER UP! BUILDING READING STRENGTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HENRY HORBACZEWSKI

HENRY HORBACZEWSKI REED ELSEVIER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYMANAGEMENT SERVICES INC1105 N MARKET ST STE 900WILMINGTON, DE 19801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and prerecorded audio tapes for teaching readingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 18, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 22, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 17, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance