USPTO serial 76339129
TARGET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TARGET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Van Thomme
TODD A VAN THOMME PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR, S EP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in database management in the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and for tire fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, magazines for customers, newsletters, newspaper inserts, booklets, leaflets, brochures, periodicals, journals, newspapers, in the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs; catalogs, instruction manuals and operating instructions in the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and in the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management consultation, namely, consultation in the nature of the organization and management of a company, namely with respect to the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and with respect to the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs; providing databases in the field of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and in the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs; business management consultation, namely, knowledge management and advice, idea management and advice and innovation management and advice for others, and managing, implementing and administrating of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and employee incentive award programs for others to promote on the job safety, quality and productivity; providing business information in the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs via websites on global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Services of a link provider providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Computer education training services, namely, that involving usage and application of computer software in the fields of knowledge management,idea management, innovation management and in the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation in the field of computer software and its applications; namely in the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and in the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs; creating and maintaining web sites for others; designing and implementing network web pages for others, namely for web pages featuring information in the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and in the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a computer network in the fields of knowledge management, idea management, innovation management and in the fields of employee suggestion programs, employee involvement programs and award programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by target software solution GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by target software solution GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TARGET
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |